Showing posts with label Standard Presort. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Standard Presort. Show all posts

Monday, August 31, 2009

Tabs Pt 2 : Revenge Of The Tabs

It’s been 4 whole months since the post office mandated a radical new rule. The last edict was to require tabs (those little circular doohickies that wrap around loose edges to keep the piece intact) on First Class letter-sized self-mailers. Here we go again.

This edict—Tabs V2, aka Tabs Redux—will undoubtedly make life more interesting for mailers of letter-sized Standard and Non-Profit rate , self-mailers, booklets and catalogs. Flats (ie pieces larger than 6-1/8” x 11-1/2”) are still exempted.


In a nutshell, effective September 8th, letter-sized self-mailers and catalogs must be between 3.5 and 6” tall and between 9 and 10.5” wide. Larger pieces can be refolded to bring them into size compliance as long as they retain the same thickness throughout.


The binding can be saddlestitched, perfect bound or glued, but not spiral bound. The bottom edge must be bound OR the spine can serve as the leading edge.


The pieces require at least 3 tabs (two on the leading edge and one on the trailing edge) unless the leading edge is also the spine. In that case, there are 2 tabs across the top and one on the trailing edge.


Confused yet? A picture is worth a thousand words. Check out the official USPS specs below:


Ready for more? Here we go…

Tabs must be at least 1.5” in diameter and can not have perforations to ease opening.

Pieces can be no thicker than ¼” and can not weigh more than 3 ounces.Pieces weighing more than 3 ounces must be put in an envelope.

Additionally, while the specs say paper can be as light as 40#, the USPS has stated its preference loudly for 70# as it is both stronger and more durable.


For designers who still don’t have the new flats addressing requirements down pat yet—6 months into that rule change—this could be a shock, as many formats will now have the addressing panel on the back cover.


Similarly, designers who don’t like tabs anyway as they obscure the designs they labor so hard to create, will find little to celebrate here. Removing the perf-less tabs will tear paper during opening. Guaranteed.


For customers who are long accustomed to one tab at top securing a piece, this could be upsetting, too. Tabbing prices will surely rise as at a minimum 3 times more material is required. The 3rd tab may also necessitate multiple passes to affix the tab in a 900 rotation, adding to run time and manpower costs.


For mailers, there is a significant financial downside. Not every tabbing machine is capable of running a 1.5” tab, so some very expensive equipment will be come obsolete overnight. For those lucky enough to have equipment that can run 1.5” tabs, it may take two or more passes on every brochure to accommodate the USPS. That means more staff time has to be allocated, there is more equipment wear-and-tear, but fewer jobs can be scheduled, there are more operational costs like utilities, and three times more supplies.


And as if that weren’t enough, mailers will have to listen to disgruntled customers who do not want to hear about 3 tabs or the extra costs…and designers who haven’t figured out that the post office is really, really serious.

More than 900 mailers contacted the post office during its “comment period” (ie in the time between when the rule was first publically proposed and the time it was cast in stone.)


The comments ranged from mailshops begging the post office to delay implementation until after the recession recedes because of extra machinery costs…to warnings about the lack of equipment on the market that can do multiple orientation affixing in one pass…to end-users complaining that perf-less wafer seals/tabs are harder for seniors to open. The USPS dismissed each objection.

So what happens if your piece does not conform to the new regs?


This is the post office we’re talking about here. The answer is obvious: you pay more postage!


How much more? Since you lose automation discounts, your postage rates could be penalized by 30 cents each!

But wait! There’s more bad news. Your piece may also take longer to deliver and it may not be in pristine shape when it arrives because it has been passed through more postal machinery.


Got it? You’ve been warned.


Questions? Call for clarification now—before you’ve set ink to paper.

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Psst! Want cheaper postage? I can get it for you Wholesale!

In 1968, Dustin Hoffman’s character in the Graduate’s learned that the future was Plastics.

In 2009, the future in direct mail may be Co-mingling.

So what is this thing, co-mingling?

Co-mingling is a process by which mail from many direct mail service bureaus and many clients served by those service bureaus are mingled together in another—possibly distant—location. The goal is to increase mail volume so that more pieces of mail go to one area. That effort results in a higher mail density (ie distribution concentration) which in turn reduces postage costs.

That’s the process in a nutshell. Here is how it works:

The co-mingler takes your postcard addressed to someone in 20001 together with my newsletters addressed to folks in 20001, and someone else’s fundraising solicitations addressed to people in 20001, then puts them on a huge machine that sorts them by destination address. Result: all the various pieces addressed to 20001 are all bundled up together in the optimal distribution sortation.

To get to the best sortation discounts (5-digit) you need at least 10 pieces of mail addressed to the same 5-digit zipcode. The next level of sortation is 3-digit, ie the first 3 digits in a zipcode. Again, you need 10 pieces of mail addressed to those 3 digits to get a reduced rate. Can’t get there? There are two more levels which are roughly regional and wider regional.

Co-mingling puts your mail in the mix with everybody else’s mail, and thereby increases the likelihood that your mail will fall into 5-digit or 3-digit sortation.

The post office rewards density of mail. The postage differential between 5-digit and regional sortation can be as much as 4 cents a piece in Standard mail. Voila! Co-mingling to the rescue.

But wait! There’s more!

The co-mingler puts all our various pieces of mail addressed to 20001—which are now in presorted order—and ships them to the SCF (postal Sectional Center Facility) serving 20001.

Again, the postal system rewards mail delivered closer to its delivery point. You can save as much as 4 cents more a letter by delivering it its DSCF—Delivery point SCF. After all, you’re paying the freight, not the USPS. So they save $$. Eureka!

Obviously, the post office is encouraging co-mingling. It means they have to do less work, and in this age of reduced staffing, that’s a big deal.

Mail houses like co-mingling because they can get their clients better postage rates.

End users love co-mingling because it can mean lower postage rates.

From one extreme to the other—from worst-case scenario to best-case scenario in Standard class—mailers could save about 9 cents per letter in postage. It all depends on density and delivery address.

It sounds like a win/win/win. But there is no such thing as a free lunch. There are some potential trade-offs. Here are 4 things to consider:

#1. Co-mingling works with First Class Presort, Standard Presort and Nonprofit Presort mail. If you’re mailing at these rates, then you’re looking for ways to save $$, so co-mingling could be just the magic bullet you need.

#2. Plan on it taking extra prep time. The mail has to get to the co-mingling plant. It can stay there for several days as the co-mingler accumulates enough mail to fill the truck headed to North Piscataway. Then it has to travel to the DSCF.

If you’re able to plan ahead and allow for the extra time, co-mingling might be just what you’re looking for.

#3. Small national mailings benefit more than large local mailings. Spread thin? Have addresses all over the country? Using co-mingling to get to higher density may reduce your postage. However, if you’re already blanketing an area, co-mingling won’t help.

#4. There’s a cost to this service, but the postage savings should more than compensate for the extra fee. You’ll be quoted a specific fee based on the number of pieces in your mailing.

So there you have it. The post office—which is already outsourcing much of its inter-city trucking to private shipping companies and drivers—is now outsourcing its sortation process to other private companies.

Privatization--It’s the future for the USPS. And co-mingling is a large part of that future. Co-mingling may not mean as much as Plastic to Mr. Joe Sixpack, but for those of us in direct mail marketing, it is just as revolutionary. ~



Interested? Wanna save on postage?

Boy, do we have a deal for you!

Call Paul&Partners to schedule an envelope mailing during July, and we’ll laser your letters for 50% OFF our usual price! If your job qualifies for co-mingling, we’ll save more $$ on your postage, too!

Here’s the dreaded fine print:
Minimum quantity of 2500 letters. Job must mail during July. You must mention special code 0709C to get this special offer.

Call us today! 703-996-0800


43670 Trade Center Place,
Suite 150, Dulles, VA 20166
Phone: 703.996.0800 Fax: 703.996.0888 1.866.365.2858
www.paulandpartners.net sales@paulandpartners